How these 'Secret 6' spies saved America Bar owner, socialite, newspaperman set gold standard for CIA today November 6, 2013
Foreign and domestic espionage has been in the news a lot this year, but despite the latest technology and intense training, the best performance of American spies is still considered to be the work of six amateurs who were pivotal in winning the American Revolution.
The amazing story of this indispensable group is outlined in “George Washington’s Secret Six: The Spy Ring that Saved the American Revolution,” by Fox News host Brian Kilmeade. Far from highly trained operatives, six unassuming colonists, ranging from a merchant to a tavern owner to a New York socialite, risked life and limb and ultimately reversed the tide of the war.
In fact, their work was so impressive that it is still the gold standard by which all future operatives are measured. . . . . “They were able to able to stop Benedict Arnold from giving away West Point. They stopped a counterfeit ring that was going to make Washington’s new country have their money worth nothing; therefore, their forces weren’t getting paid and they’d all leave. And they were also able to get the Battle of Yorktown ahead of time,” he said.
The “Culper Spy Ring” was so secretive that Washington never even knew who the leader was. Historians didn’t figure out it was Robert Townsend until well into the 20th century. There was one female spy, known as Agent 355, who is still unidentified but was critical in exposing the treachery of Benedict Arnold.
“This woman infiltrated the social scene. We know that for sure. She found out where the parties were. She found out that there was a Patriot general about to turn sides and Washington was able to figure out it was Benedict Arnold,” Kilmeade said. “If they were unable to unearth this, West Point would have gone to the British, the Hudson would have gone to the British and we don’t win the war.”
One of the reasons the woman’s identity remains a secret is because historians believe the British figured out her role in stopping Arnold and she was killed.
The spy ring was created out of desperation in 1776. After chasing the British out of Boston, Washington’s forces were routed badly on Long Island and barely survived to fight another day. At this point, Washington knew he needed more intelligence and needed it on Long Island and in New York City where the British were so heavily concentr. . . . . "
Most people also don't realize that General Gates wife (British Officer) was American. As such she spied for John Hancock in the early days prior to Lexington and Concord and she is the one who tipped off what was coming which led to Paul Revere's ride. She did this much the same way, infiltrating teas/luncheons etc. of the British officers and their wives collecting information which she then passed on.
She was later caught and Gates was so furious with his wife that he shipped her off to live the remainder of her days at the Gates family home in England. Even when the war ended she was never allowed to return.
I wonder if the above lady might have been one and the same and the reason no one knows is because she spent the rest of her life in England?
I read somewhere thateven before hostilities broke out, Gen. Thomas Gage's wife, American born, may have spied for the Americans, and reported on British plans, etc. Gage sent her to England, even beforethe situation blew up.
The information that I posted in #2 above came from the local historical society in Lexington, MA.
I have no idea where their info came from. Apparently the night before the historic battle in Lexington, after the warnings came, John Hancock had a trunk filled with papers at his parents' home in Lexington. That trunk had a lot of incriminating evidence implicating Gates' wife. A servant managed to drag it off into the woods and get it to safety and it did not fall into British hands - at least that evening it didn't - so the historical society says anyway.
What happened to the papers after that no one knows.
Quote: algernonpj wrote in post #5@conservgramma @PzLdr
Thanks for the interesting historical tidbits that I never learned in school.
You're very welcome.
John Hancock was indeed an interesting individual. At the time of the Revolution he was a very wealthy man, his business pursuits and been quite successful. Had it not been for him and his generosity in giving away the bulk of that wealth to aid the American cause the British may well have prevailed. It was Hancock and his personal fortune that paid salaries, etc. in those early days.
If any man deserved to write his signature on our founding documents with such a bold and 'large' flair - it was him.