"After more than a decade of debate and a record-setting proceeding that attracted nearly 4 million public comments, the time to settle the Net Neutrality question has arrived. This week, I will circulate to the members of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) proposed new rules to preserve the internet as an open platform for innovation and free expression. This proposal is rooted in long-standing regulatory principles, marketplace experience, and public input received over the last several months....

http://www.wired.com/2015/02/fcc-chairma...net-neutrality/"



I think this one should have a .

All I can say TM is that this debate has been filled with gobbly-gok from day 1. I've tried to follow some of the debate years ago, and always finished leaving scratching my head. Lately I don't bother peering (that's a Net Neutrality pun there!! lol) too deeply into any of this crap. I use a simple rule: If it is something coming from the federal gubmint, it is likely to do to the Internet something similar to how zerocare has "protected patients" and made "care affordable."


f

We're screwed: "This week, I will circulate to the members of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) proposed new rules to preserve the internet as an open platform for innovation and free expression."

Just out of curiosity when did the FCC get any authority over the content of the 'net and what rule, law, or body gave it to them?