Obama and Elizabeth Warren’s Big Lie About Student Debt
Elizabeth Warren, a tenured celebrity professor who jumped into politics, and Barack Obama, an untenured law school instructor, who made it big in politics, know exactly why student loan debt is so high and why their measures do nothing to address its real causes.
Harvard Law paid Warren $350,000 to teach a single course. When Scott Brown brought it up during a debate about student loans, she protested. “I want to talk about the issues. Senator Brown wants to launch attacks.”
But Warren’s outrageous compensation is the issue. Harvard pays the adjuncts who teach many of its undergraduate classes an average of $11,037. Elizabeth Warren, who likes comparing the salary of a company’s employees to its CEO’s, isn’t comparing the $429,981 that Harvard paid her before she ran for office to an adjunct’s salary. And unlike a CEO, all Warren did was show up for a little bit and then go back to her real business as a lawyer and government consultant.
The untenured Obama was making a more modest $69,287 for teaching three courses. He was politically connected, but had yet to become a celebrity. After leaving the White House, he can expect to easily pull down a small fortune for showing up to teach a brief seminar at any college.
The price of celebrity professors is paid for by student loans. The successful celebrity professors go on to a career in politics condemning Republicans for not caring enough about student loans.
In both the national economy and the campus, the biggest driver of inequality is bureaucracy.
The classic campus was top heavy with professors and light on administrators. The modern campus has more bureaucrats than professors. The average ratio is two administrators to one full-time faculty member. In the 1960s it used to be two faculty members to one administrator.
The rise of college administrators was driven by government regulations. The more colleges depended on the government to maintain their industry, the more they catered to government. The modern university isn’t run by donors, by student demand or even by its endless ranks of administrators. Like most government subsidized industries, it is run by the government.
Normal businesses have a profit motive for controlling the growth of their internal bureaucracy. The profit motive of universities lies in expanding their bureaucracy to better interact with their government masters. The very business of student loans increases the size of university administrations even while the cost of that administration increases the size of student loans.
In universities, as in their government templates, bureaucracy, regulation and spending feed off each other. Regulation results in more bureaucracy and more bureaucracy results in more regulation until the system can no longer fulfill its default function.
lots more good stuff too!
*******************
“Show me a young Conservative and I'll show you someone with no heart. Show me an old Liberal and I'll show you someone with no brains.” ¯ Winston S. Churchill
As we watch our country swirl around the toilet bowl, we can at least have a laugh or two before it disappears down the sewer and is gone forever.
Won't it be funny if: just like the indomitable Hilliary Xlinton in '08 was edged out of her manifest destiny to be the first woman president by a complete and utterly incompetent community organizer - all because black trumps woman;
won't if be funny if in '16 she's edged out again?
and give the democrats credit: they've managed to do what I thought was impossible and find someone (in Warren) who is even LESS qualified than Zero.
The sad thing is - Warren will likely win. But then again, I guess it doesn't really matter.
The sad thing is - Warren will likely win. But then again, I guess it doesn't really matter.
I doubt that. She is missing all the qualities that every President since Ford had. Charm. She is physically repugnant. Her speech is more shrill that Hitlary. She is an absolute nobody to anyone except hard Leftists but she has enough of a record to sink her in a Primary. If she runs it will be as a sacrificial lamb until the Rats can get their bench back together.
The sad thing is - Warren will likely win. But then again, I guess it doesn't really matter.
I doubt that. She is missing all the qualities that every President since Ford had. Charm. She is physically repugnant. Her speech is more shrill that Hitlary. She is an absolute nobody to anyone except hard Leftists but she has enough of a record to sink her in a Primary.
And these are her good attributes! I still can't believe she beat Scott Brown. He didn't fight her like a man. He skirted her hypocrisy issues, she herself being the cause for incredibly high education costs! And now we fools must suffer her entry into our future? Thanks a lot Putz Brown. Learn to really fight before you tackle another senate race against one of these liberal women.
Elizabeth Warren, a tenured celebrity professor who jumped into politics, and Barack Obama, an untenured law school instructor, who made it big in politics, know exactly why student loan debt is so high and why their measures do nothing to address its real causes.
Harvard Law paid Warren $350,000 to teach a single course. When Scott Brown brought it up during a debate about student loans, she protested. “I want to talk about the issues. Senator Brown wants to launch attacks.”
But Warren’s outrageous compensation is the issue. Harvard pays the adjuncts who teach many of its undergraduate classes an average of $11,037. Elizabeth Warren, who likes comparing the salary of a company’s employees to its CEO’s, isn’t comparing the $429,981 that Harvard paid her before she ran for office to an adjunct’s salary. And unlike a CEO, all Warren did was show up for a little bit and then go back to her real business as a lawyer and government consultant.
*******************
“Show me a young Conservative and I'll show you someone with no heart. Show me an old Liberal and I'll show you someone with no brains.” ¯ Winston S. Churchill
ZitatUnlike it, Warren’s bill isn’t really about student loans and isn’t meant to pass. Like her Bank on Students Loan Fairness Act, it’s political theater by a lifelong fraud who began her career as a fake Indian, was a fake Republican and is now a fake Socialist. It would be easier to find a garden spot on Mars than a single honest moment in the career of Elizabeth Ann Herring.
Reminds me of the current WH resident: a fake US citizen, a fake constitutional scholar, a fake president of the Harvard Law Review, a fake Christian, a Fake senator, a fake heterosexual, a fake Social Security number, ..........
Read something the other day that explained why Warren's university salary was so high: it was funded by one of the big Wall Street law firms that she's had a lot of connections with, wish that I saved the link....
Quote: FWP wrote in post #6Read something the other day that explained why Warren's university salary was so high: it was funded by one of the big Wall Street law firms that she's had a lot of connections with, wish that I saved the link....