Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer: Las Vegas Shaping Up to Be Politically Motivated – “Deliberate Act of Terror” (VIDEO) by Jim Hoft
Former CIA trained operative Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer went on with Martha MacCallum Tuesday night on FOX News. Shaffer said the Vegas massacre is shaping up to be a deliberate act of terror by a killer who was politically motivated.
WOW ! The Lib media and that is basically all the media dropped this story real quick. That being said ONE has to know there is way more than they are telling us and the media knows it and running for cover. Wanna BET if and when the truth be known he PADDOCK has ties to ISIS or some other terror group and did not act ALONE. He was killed as the scape goat for someone. The media know this and that is why they shut up. ISIS is involved but of course it will be reported that it is TRUMP fault and he worked the details out with RUSSIA.
Quote: Longiron wrote in post #2WOW ! The Lib media and that is basically all the media dropped this story real quick. That being said ONE has to know there is way more than they are telling us and the media knows it and running for cover. Wanna BET if and when the truth be known he PADDOCK has ties to ISIS or some other terror group and did not act ALONE. He was killed as the scape goat for someone. The media know this and that is why they shut up. ISIS is involved but of course it will be reported that it is TRUMP fault and he worked the details out with RUSSIA.
It was dropped like a hot potato. There are things we have been told that don't add up. The fact that the MSM is not painting Paddock as a white supremicist Nazi is very suspicious
Illegitimi non Carborundum
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.- Orwell
The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it - Orwell
I forget who I was listening to on the radio, might have been Mark Levine, but whoever it was pointed out ISIS has made any number of claims about any number of things over the years, and in all cases have proven to be truthful and accurate.
Quote: Cincinnatus wrote in post #4I forget who I was listening to on the radio, might have been Mark Levine, but whoever it was pointed out ISIS has made any number of claims about any number of things over the years, and in all cases have proven to be truthful and accurate.
Food for thought.
I read the same assertion from two different analysts yesterday, but can't find the link.
Pam Geller has pointed out:
Contrary to FBI Hooey, Steven Paddock Fits the Profile of a Convert By Pamela Geller - on October 9, 2017
The idea floated by “intel” agencies that Steven Paddock didn’t fit the profile of a Muslim convert is absurd on its face, and further proof that the keystone clowns and their “profilers” at the FBI haven’t a clue. How can they profile what they refuse to acknowledge, learn about or recognize?
The fact is the FBI has nothing. Over a week after the monstrous slaughter, they have nothing and yet they have dismissed ISIS claims out of hand, despite the fact ISIS does not take credit for attacks that are not theirs. Not only did they take credit, they did something they never did before – they doubled and tripled down. The Islamic State (IS) featured an infographic on the Las Vegas attack in the 100th issue of its al-Naba weekly newspaper, and indicated that the shooter, “Abu Abdul Barr al-Amriki,” had converted to Islam six months ago.
Jihad is the only motive that makes any sense. And the fact that the FBI has nothing else points to that. That Steven Paddock left no digital trail might very well be deliberate – to show how incompetent our law enforcement agencies are. ISIS took credit for the downing of the Russian jetliner in the Sinai. Everyone in law enforcement dismissed that too. Until ISIS provided proof a couple of weeks later, that is. I suspect we may see the same thing happen here. The Vegas attack mirrors the sophisticated planning and secrecy consistent with more complex ISIS plots like Sinai explosion of Russian airliner.
We have been told that because Paddock was white and 64, it is unlikely that he would be a convert to Islam. Why? Islam is ideological – it’s not a race or an age. It’s a belief system. It’s also being said that if Paddock was a convert, Homeland Security is going to have to change their whole approach to jihad terror in the Homeland. We can only hope. Because this war has nothing to do with age, race or gender – it’s religious. And profiling is required. On the top of my watch list would be converts. Who would be attracted to an ideology that is the cause of hatred, misogyny, subjugation and slaughter?