No surprise to hear Paul say this considering he’s teaming up with amnesty supporters Michael Bloomberg and Grover Norquist.
Via BuzzFeed:
In the wake of Rep. Eric Cantor’s stunning primary defeat Tuesday night, many conservatives have rushed to declare the outcome a referendum on Republican efforts to pursue immigration reform, a key wedge issue in the race. But Tea Party hero Sen. Rand Paul isn’t buying it.
A senior adviser to Paul told BuzzFeed Wednesday morning that the Kentucky senator rejects early analysis arguing that the GOP base has adopted a zero-tolerance policy toward immigration reform. “Elections are almost never a referendum on one issue; they are a referendum on the people on the ballot,” the adviser said.
Paul is scheduled to appear Wednesday on a teleconference with Grover Norquist, a conservative champion of immigration reform, to discuss the need for action on the issue. He agreed to participate in the call long before Cantor’s defeat and the wave of celebration by immigration hawks it caused, but Paul’s advisers says he has no plans to change his message.
“He’s going to say what he’s always said; that yes, he believes we need immigration reform. Anybody who looks at the system has to admit it’s broken,” the adviser said. “But he has always said that reform needs to start first at the border, and that any reforms that follow that are staggered over a number of years, contingent on border security, and sent back to Congress every year so they can say, yes, these reforms are working.”
I've been trying to figure out where Rand is on immigration and illegals for a while.
Per his senate web page:
ZitatI do not support amnesty, I support legal immigration and recognize that the country has been enriched by those who seek the freedom to make a life for themselves. However, millions of illegal immigrants are crossing our border without our knowledge and causing a clear threat to our national security. I want to work in the Senate to secure our border immediately. In addition, I support the creation of a border fence and increased border patrol capabilities.
Immigrants should meet the current requirements, which should be enforced and updated. I realize that subsidizing something creates more of it, and do not think the taxpayer should be forced to pay for welfare, medical care and other expenses for illegal immigrants. Once the subsidies for illegal immigration are removed, the problem will likely become far less common.
I support local solutions to illegal immigration as protected by the 10th amendment. I support making English the official language of all documents and contracts.
Millions crossing our border without our knowledge constitutes a clear threat to our nation's security. Instead of closing military bases at home and renting space in Europe, I am open to the construction of bases to protect our border. http://www.paul.senate.gov/?p=issue&id=12
This all sounds good until you realize there is nothing about the 30 - 40 million and counting illegals in the US, nothing concrete about removing the 'safety net' that attracts illegals.