Is anybody else tired of being jerked around by this dog and pony show? We all know how its going to play out. There will be lots of startling news bites to distract from the failure of Obamacare, Jobs, economy, foreign policy, Bad poll results for Dems, vote fraud investigations, etc., and the end result will be delay delay delay, with actions blocked in the Senate by Democrats and Rinos. If they ever did get somewhere Barry would simply pardon whoever they finally did something too.

Zitat

---

dog and pony [i.e. horseface] show . . .

---

. . . perfect description of the former - and current - sec'ys of State. Except we'd probably be further along if Lassie or Mr. Ed were actually running things. They couldn't be much worse.

Kinda hard to argue with this:

Is anybody else tired of being jerked around by this dog and pony show? We all know how its going to play out. There will be lots of startling news bites to distract from the failure of Obamacare, Jobs, economy, foreign policy, Bad poll results for Dems, vote fraud investigations, etc., and the end result will be delay delay delay, with actions blocked in the Senate by Democrats and Rinos. If they ever did get somewhere Barry would simply pardon whoever they finally did something too.

Meanwhile this revelation from Sharyl Attkisson which demonstrates the media's collusion in the cover up:

CBS told me it wasn’t relevant to our Benghazi coverage that the president of the news division is Ben Rhodes’s brother

Via Larry O’Connor, skip to 6:00 for the key bit. She wanted the network to disclose in its Benghazi stories that, oh by the way, the guy who’s in charge of news programming here is a blood relation to the guy who was overseeing the White House’s end of the controversial CIA talking points that Susan Rice got after the attack. The response: No, that’s so irrelevant to our coverage that we shouldn’t devote even three seconds of airtime to mentioning it every now and then. Better to leave CBS viewers totally in the dark. You know who I bet wasn’t in the dark, though? CBS employees. Attkisson says the newsroom didn’t hear anything from David Rhodes about not covering Benghazi, but if you were a reporter and you knew that the boss’s brother was mixed up in a major unflattering national security story, would you need to be warned explicitly for that relationship to affect your coverage? If there’s no way to stop news bureaus from being led by people who have a family investment in the success of the administration, the least you can do is mention the connection and let viewers decide for themselves

http://hotair.com/archives/2014/05/01/sh...hodess-brother/