Give up meat, coal, oil, economic growth and national sovereignty - orders new IPCC climate report by James Delingpole 14 Apr 2014,
The United Nations (UN) has delivered its latest verdict on the measures necessary to save the world from global warming and the news is as grim as it is predictable and wearisomely familiar:
More regulation from "experts", technocrats and bureaucrats at supranational organisations, such as the one whose initials begin with U and end with N.
More taxpayer subsidies for expensive, inefficient renewable energy.
More nuclear power (with shale gas used as a transitional fuel to replace coal).
The abandonment of fossil fuels.
Less meat consumption.
A single, globally-regulated price for carbon dioxide.
More local-government-enforced walking, cycling and public transportation.
More back-door wealth redistribution from the West to the developing world in the name of "sustainability"
All at a cost to the global economy of up to 3.7 per cent of GDP by 2030, provided we act now.
These are the recommendations of Working Group III of the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), due to be officially announced in Berlin on Monday.
..............................................
This action will set back economic growth, involve significant "behavioural change" and "devalue fossil fuel assets", the report admits. But only with "major institutional and technological changes" can the world avert an even greater threat. If no action is taken, it warns, temperatures may rise by as much as 4.8 degrees C by 2100.
"There is a clear message from science: to avoid dangerous interference with the climate system we need to move away from business as usual," said Germany's Otmar Edenhofer, one of the three co-chairs of the report.
However, Edenhofer's claim sits somewhat at odds with the evidence produced in the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report's two earlier sections.
Where, Sanguine? I lived in TX for over 30 years and still consider it home. About this time of year turning on the a/c was getting serious consideration. You up north, like in the panhandle?
Quote: Cincinnatus wrote in post #4Where, Sanguine? I lived in TX for over 30 years and still consider it home. About this time of year turning on the a/c was getting serious consideration. You up north, like in the panhandle?
Central, near Austin.
I had the A/C on yesterday, and now have the heat on. It's way late in the year for these temps. Very odd.
What part of Texas did you live in? And, yes, there are no ex-Texans. Well, except maybe Karl Rove.