Former speechwriter for Robert F. Kennedy and lifelong Democrat Adam Walinsky announced he will vote for Republican candidate Donald Trump this November, according to Politico.
Walinsky, who served in the Department of Justice during John F. Kennedy's administration, accuses modern Democrats of having "become the Party of War."
"A home for arms merchants, mercenaries, academic war planners, lobbyists for every foreign intervention, promoters of color revolutions, failed generals, exploiters of the natural resources of corrupt governments," he continued.
Walinsky is gravely concerned with Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton's support for military intervention.
"She proclaims herself ready to invade Syria immediately after taking the oath of office," Walinsky said. "Her shadow war cabinet brims with the architects of war and disaster for the last decades – the neocons who led us to our present pass, in Iraq, in Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, Yemen, in Ukraine, unrepentant of all past error, ready to resume it all with fresh trillions and fresh blood."
Walinsky isn't the only Democrat to support Trump. Lifelong Democrat Christian Rickers, who, according to Business Insider, "has a well-established career in Virginia Democratic politics," founded Trumpocrats PAC, which he describes to Business Insider as "a place to organize" for pro-Trump Democrats.
Although Walinsky acknowledged Trump's flaws, he said the billionaire is the sole "potential American president [who] has had the intelligence, the vision, the sheer sanity to see that America cannot fight the entire world at once."
Trump, Walinsky said, is the only candidate that "has pointed out how senseless it is to seek confrontation with Russia and China, at the same time that we are trying to suppress the very jihadist movements that they also are attacking."
It is Trump's "independence, his willingness to name facts however unpleasant, together with his great political courage, that can give us hope and even some confidence that he may be up to the job.
"Perhaps most important, he has proven that he is not intimidated by the generals and admirals who have, up to this day, had their unimpeded way with our wars and our budgets, to the immense loss of both," Walinsky added.
Libya under Gaddafi was a stable country Gaddafi was a secular Moslem who kept the Jihadis and anarchists under control. For a fee he prevented Africans from using Libya as a starting point to cross the Mediterranean to the EU.
IMHO Gadaffis big mistake was to run Libya for the Libyans and himself., of course Libya was prosperous. It had very valuable grade oil;
The Following se articles go under the label 'interesting timing'. When you read them keep in mind Gaddafi was killed on October 29, 2011 Muslim Brotherhood Leader Qaradawi Orders Libyan Leader Gaddafi Killed ByPamela Geller on February 22, 2011 he Muslim Brotherhood is making its move on Libya. http://pamelageller.com/2011/02/muslim-b...er-killed.html/
On February 20, 2011 through his son, Gaddafi reached out to the international community: A Wikileaks Hillary eMail demonstrates she was aware of the speech. https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/24538
Again in June 2011, Saif al-Islam and his father, Muammar, announced that they were willing to hold elections and that Muammar Gaddafi would step aside if he lost. Saif al-Islam stated that the elections could be held within three months and transparency would be guaranteed through international observers. NATO and the rebels rejected the offer, and NATO soon resumed their bombardment of Tripoli.[47] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saif_al-Is...fi#cite_note-47
Rebels dismiss election offer, NATO pounds Tripoli By Nick Carey TRIPOLI | Thu Jun 16, 2011 6:34pm EDT "Reuters) - NATO planes resumed bombardments of Tripoli after Muammar Gaddafi's son said the Libyan leader was willing to hold elections and step aside if he lost, an offer rejected by rebels and the United States." http://web.archive.org/web/2011061823592...E7270JP20110616
This need a little photo shopping, bbut you get the idea
Illegitimi non Carborundum
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.- Orwell
Exclusive: Hillary Killed Libya Peace Deal Over Personal Vendetta, Claims Whistleblower Gaddafi agreed to hold free elections, but Clinton’s refusal led to ISIS takeover, thousands of deaths, international migrant crisis Paul Joseph Watson October 3, 2016
Hillary Clinton personally nixed a peace deal in Libya that would have led to free elections and prevented the country being seized by ISIS, all because of a personal vendetta she had with Muammar Gaddafi, according to explosive new claims made by a whistleblower who personally oversaw the negotiations.
Christian preacher Dr. Kilari Anand Paul is a global peace ambassador originally from India who is now a naturalized U.S. citizen.
Colonel Gaddafi personally invited Dr. Paul to Tripoli, Libya for peace talks having looked up to Paul as a spiritual leader since 1992 and having been impressed with the evangelist’s counseling work with King Hussein of Jordan and Yasser Arafat.
Dr. Paul arrived in Libya on August 5, 2011 with a contingent of Indian Members of Parliament and others on his peacekeeping team. Upon hearing of their arrival via press reports, General Wesley Clark encouraged Dr. Paul to try to negotiate a settlement between the U.S. State Department and Gaddafi in order to put a halt to the brutal conflict.
Over the course of ten days, an agreement was reached between Libyan Prime Minister Baghdadi al-Mahmoudi, President Muammar Gaddafi and the U.S. State Department in coordination with the Obama White House. The deal was overseen by General Clark as well as U.S. Rep Dennis Kucinich.
Under the terms of the deal, detailed below in an official letter signed by Prime Minister Baghdadi al-Mahmoudi on August 19, 2011, Gaddafi agreed to cease hostilities and immediately move towards holding democratic elections that would put an end to his own 42-year dictatorship.
...............................................
Had this deal gone through, it would have saved countless lives that were lost in the aftermath, prevented the collapse of Libya into a failed state fought over by rival jihadist gangs and significantly alleviated the international migrant crisis that worsened dreadfully in the years that followed. It could even have contained ISIS’ spread across the Middle East. The Benghazi attack would never have happened.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton didn’t want peace. She wanted Muammar Gaddafi dead for her own selfish, spiteful reason – the fact that Gaddafi had favored Barack Obama over her own campaign during the 2008 presidential election cycle
ZitatSecretary of State Hillary Clinton didn’t want peace. She wanted Muammar Gaddafi dead for her own selfish, spiteful reason – the fact that Gaddafi had favored Barack Obama over her own campaign during the 2008 presidential election cycle
Wow! Consistent though with her vindictive personality.
ZitatSecretary of State Hillary Clinton didn’t want peace. She wanted Muammar Gaddafi dead for her own selfish, spiteful reason – the fact that Gaddafi had favored Barack Obama over her own campaign during the 2008 presidential election cycle
Wow! Consistent though with her vindictive personality.
Yeah, look how close America is to having this immoral egomaniac in the White House.
there goes, "...with liberty and justice for all."
INSIDE EVERY LIBERAL IS A TOTALITARIAN SCREAMING TO GET OUT -- Frontpage mag