Yes, I know this is the Hilliary thread and the title involves Obama, but the story has to do with her email travails and the odd lack of MSM curiosity about the whole affair and the latest revelations.

Zitat

---

That Barack Obama communicated in 2012—under a redacted pseudonym—with Hillary Clinton on the then secretary of State's permeable home-brew email server and then claimed he did not know of that server's existence until it was reported in the press in 2014 is far more than the usual politician's prevarication.

Since the fish rots from the top—and in this case it stinks to high heaven—the surfacing of this particular presidential lie calls to question the entire FBI inquiry into the Clinton server, an investigation whose credibility was paper thin in the first place and has now completely vanished.

It's time to ask that age-old question: "What did the president know and when did he know it?"

That we do know (as of this Friday's dump) that one of Clinton's own IT workers referred to her then just-announced 60-day email retention policy (who does that?) as "Hillary's coverup operation" almost (but not completely) tells the story in those three quoted words. Even though they say it's not the crime, but the coverup, in this case, it's both.

The seriousness of this crime/coverup—involving the national security of our country—makes Watergate seem like a minor kerfuffle at a sewing circle. If the mainstream media does not investigate this thoroughly, they are unquestionably the court eunuchs many of us have accused them of being. Worse, they are the enablers of the decline of Western civilization.  Without a free and honest press -- some of it anyway -- not to mention adherence to the rule of law, such a civilization cannot survive.  And the decline can come remarkably swiftly.  We have plenty of  examples of that from twentieth century Europe.

---

[more, worth a read] https://pjmedia.com/diaryofamadvoter/201...ssal-email-lie/

Obama lied. The FBI did another document dump on a Friday. The MSM is deaf, dumb, and blind. Business as usual.

MSM, predictably, flunks the test.

And what do you bet, if Trump is elected, that they suddenly develop insatiable journalistic curiousity?

Zitat

---

And what do you bet, if Trump is elected, that they suddenly develop insatiable journalistic curiousity?

---

It isn't like they are actually waiting.

Zitat

---

The Washington Post has assigned 20 reporters to look into every aspect of Donald Trump's past as the presumptive GOP nominee seeks to become the next president of the United States, famed Post associate editor, Bob Woodward, said Wednesday.

---

http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/washingt...5/11/id/728416/

Zitat

---

"One of the most important things for voters to evaluate in any election is the full measure of a candidate’s views, ideas, and temperament over time,”

---

Excuse me but doesn't that cut both ways? When are we going to get the truth about Hilliary's location and actions or inactions the night of Benghazi? When are we going to see transcripts of the speeches she gave to Wall St fat cats which earned her so much money? When are we going to get the complete truth about her emails? Her health?

Paging David Brock. David Brock to the white discourtesy phone, please.