Ick!

She won't be charged? Fascinating. The perp is tied up, incapable of threatening or further injuring the woman. Does she flee? No. Does she call the cops? No. Have someone call the cops? No. She not only castrates the defendant, she cooks his testicles and makes him eat them? Sorry. If a jury wants to walk her, fine. But that broad should have been charged with a couple of felonies, and, if convicted, done a shitload of time in the slammer. I'd have tried her myself.

PzLdr, it is indeed a rare event for me to disagree with you, but here I do. This is poetic justice and I'm all for it, especially with this guy who is "a three-time convicted felon." If the government won't do its job and protect us, then it becomes incumbent upon us to protect ourselves. This scumbucket will never rape anyone again and others inclined to do so may now think twice.

Quote: Cincinnatus wrote in post #4

---

PzLdr, it is indeed a rare event for me to disagree with you, but here I do. This is poetic justice and I'm all for it, especially with this guy who is "a three-time convicted felon." If the government won't do its job and protect us, then it becomes incumbent upon us to protect ourselves. This scumbucket will never rape anyone again and others inclined to do so may now think twice.

---

Oh in a perfect world this would happen to every single rapefugee running amok all across Europe!

Zitat

---

Vigilantism is still vigilantism. And once you establish the principle that it's OK to do self-justice, where's the line. This clown could have been put away for the rest of his life on rape and kidnapping. He still may. But the fact that no thought, apparently, was given to charging Calamity Jane by law enforcement boggles my mind.

---

Yeah, right, PzLdr. Vigilantism is a terrible thing especially when the state does such a fine job of letting a three-time loser out on the streets to continue spreading his mayhem. This clown, as you say, "could have been put away for the rest of his life on rape and kidnapping." But given our criminal "justice' system would he?

Moreover this case doesn't exactly meet the standard of vigilantism. Their was no mob hunting down an alleged perp. The aggressor was right there, he unquestionably did the deed, and she got immediate justice.

Good girl.

Quote: Cincinnatus wrote in post #8

---

Zitat

---

Vigilantism is still vigilantism. And once you establish the principle that it's OK to do self-justice, where's the line. This clown could have been put away for the rest of his life on rape and kidnapping. He still may. But the fact that no thought, apparently, was given to charging Calamity Jane by law enforcement boggles my mind.

---

Yeah, right, PzLdr. Vigilantism is a terrible thing especially when the state does such a fine job of letting a three-time loser out on the streets to continue spreading his mayhem. This clown, as you say, "could have been put away for the rest of his life on rape and kidnapping." But given our criminal "justice' system would he?

Moreover this case doesn't exactly meet the standard of vigilantism. Their was no mob hunting down an alleged perp. The aggressor was right there, he unquestionably did the deed, and she got immediate justice.

Good girl.

---

Vigilantism is an individual taking justice into his own hands. You going to allow someone with a weapon to shoot a burglar outside the house fleeing in the back? No mob. He did the deed. In most states, if not all, the shooter would be charged.

Despite the fact the perp was incapable of any action, drunk and tied, the woman did not disengage , leave, and call law enforcement. Instead she intentionally mutilated him, intentionally cooked his genitalia and intentionally forced him, at gun point, to eat his own flesh. That's called premeditation. And under the law, that should result in charges, and a plea or a trial.

PzLdr, I am going to ask you a simple question and after that leave this subject alone as it is apparent we will never agree.

If this young woman was your 19 year old daughter, would you still feel the same way?