Over the past week, as it’s begun to sink in that -- no foolin’ -- Donald Trump might really be the nominee, I began to notice a trend among family and friends who are stalwart Republicans. These are people who consistently vote, and consistently vote (R) straight down the line. And they are tortured because they cannot bring themselves to vote for the Republican nominee this year, if the Republican nominee is Trump.
“She’s beside herself,” my mother said of a near relation, who is apparently seriously considering voting for a Democrat for the first time. I wanted to understand this phenomenon better. I asked on Twitter whether this was a real thing, just as the hashtag #NeverTrump began trending. And I got an earful. So I invited lifelong Republicans who had decided that they couldn’t vote for Trump in the general, even if he got the nomination, to tell me their stories. Hundreds of e-mails poured in, and are still arriving. They're informative.
What surprised me? First, the sheer number of people who sat down and composed lengthy e-mails on a weekend.
Second, the passion they showed. These people are not quietly concerned about Trump. They are appalled, repulsed, afraid and dismayed that their party could have let this happen. They wrote in the strongest possible language, and many were adamant that they would not stay home on Election Day, but in fact would vote for Hillary Clinton in the general and perhaps leave the Republican Party for good.
Third was the sheer breadth. I got everything from college students to Midwestern farmers to military intelligence officers to former officials in Republican administrations, one of whom said he would “tattoo #NeverTrump” on a rather delicate part of his anatomy if it would keep Donald J. Trump from becoming the nominee. They were from all segments of the party -- urban professionals, yes, but also stalwart evangelicals, neoconservatives, libertarians, Tea Partiers, the whole patchwork of ideological groups of which the Republican coalition is made.
Fourth was what they didn’t say. Some people talked about economic liberty issues, like taxes, or Obamacare, but that was a minority. “Lack of substance” was another minor issue -- often present, but never alone.
The main arguments were his authoritarianism, his lack of any principle besides the further aggrandizement of one Donald J. Trump, his racism and misogyny, and his erratic behavior, which led a whole lot of people to write that they were afraid to have him anywhere within a thousand miles of the nuclear launch codes.
I spent Sunday chopping e-mails up into quotes and organizing them by theme. They are excerpted below, with minor edits for clarity, and the whole collection is here (anonymized, with any specific identifiers stripped out). You can see for yourself what people are saying about their decision. Maybe you'll see some themes I did not. Please join the conversation in a comment below.
Meanwhile, here is what I learned from asking #NeverTrump folks what they’re thinking.
They’re party stalwarts.
They understand that refusing to vote for Trump means that a Democrat will probably win.
Many will actually consider voting for a Democrat, rather than just staying home.
They understand that a Democratic win means that the Supreme Court will flip liberal, and probably stay that way for a while.
They think the GOP is better off losing the election than winning it with Trump at the helm.
I've copied the first six bullet points. It goes on for at least 13 more points including that he's actually a liberal!!!! oh my that one is so weird!!! and then there's the typical, he's an egotistical maniac, the character charges that he's a misogynist and he's authoritarian. The charges get more ridiculous as the article goes on. And each one of these topic points has paragraphs of material! We are witnessing loony times! TM
******* "What is a moderate interpretation of the text? Halfway between what it really means and what you'd like it to mean?" Justice Antonin Scalia 1936-2016
They understand that refusing to vote for Trump means that a Democrat will probably win.
Not just any Democrat but Hillary Clinton. Is anyone going to tell me seriously she would be an improvement over Trump? I'm not talking about the lesser of two evils here, but the actual record of Hillary going back to her being fired from the Watergate Committee all the way through to the private server. The Bimbo eruptions, her dictatorial role in Bill's insurance plan, and the demonstrable lies about Benghazi and Bosnia, the evidence of her lack of any moral or ethical standards is indisputable. And yet it is Trump who gets the negative press while she is allowed to avoid or deny her record.
Quote: truthkeeper wrote in post #3Plain and simple, they're nuts.
I'd vote for any of them over Livia Clinton - although it would have been awfully hard with the Jebster.
The woman is totally amoral and thoroughly scares me.
I shudder to even think about the havoc she would wreak...
Megan McArdle is just softening the public up to 'hold their nose' and vote for whatever piece of garbage the eGOP hopes to replace Trump with if he wins the nominations, perhaps the jebster or mittens. She is shilling for the anti-Trump eGOP.
Who knows if Megan even received these letters and who knows who is tweeting to #nevertrump ? Megan has joined the -R wind of the smear machine.
Christie is already getting flack for endorsing Trump.
Megan can't handle the fact that us unwashed masses have caught on to the eGOP's game of bait and switch. Has it even impressed here that Trump is winning primaries with record numbers voting in the Republican primaries.
I refuse to play these games anymore. If the eGOP robs Trump of the nomination I will either write in Donald J Trump or stay home.
Quote: truthkeeper wrote in post #5Are you kidding? I am TOTALLY prepared to write in Trump.
I'll bet you 98% of his supporters would too.
And if the GOP elite keeps this up, more than that will.
That would set all records!!! Imagine the first self funded presidential campaign followed by the first write-in victory for president?
they just don't understand the pride us people take in this candidate's willingness and ability to stick it to them!!!!
******* "What is a moderate interpretation of the text? Halfway between what it really means and what you'd like it to mean?" Justice Antonin Scalia 1936-2016