Using her logic, permanent unemployment benefits would eliminate unemployment. Seriously starting to think this woman has suffered head trauma. It’s really sweet how the people who scoffed at everyone losing their health insurance thanks to ObamaCare are suddenly making an major issue out of extending long-term unemployment benefits. But hey, anything to distract from the ObamaCare mess will do.
Zitat Roughly 1.3 million people lost their extended unemployment benefits on Saturday as Congress allowed the program to expire.
Democrats — angry that an extension wasn’t included in the recently-enacted budget agreement — have vowed to make the benefits the first item on their 2014 agenda.
Republicans contend that lawmakers would better serve their constituents by directing their efforts to other job-boosting areas, especially given that a year-long unemployment extension comes with a $26 billion price tag. They also are waiting on Democrats to put forward a specific plan.
Underlying the debate is a steadily improving economy, which has seen the jobless rate fall to a five-year low of 7 percent in November. The Federal Reserve gave its own vote of confidence to the recovery when it agreed to pull back from its years’ worth of stimulus action in December, citing the steady gains.
According to Obama the economy’s doing great, so let’s extend unemployment. Ironic how he called these senators from his luxury vacation. Pelosi, meanwhile, has apparently been drinking heavily during the holidays.
Zitat Democrats rebut that demand by arguing the extension of benefits is actually an economic boon. Pelosi and others point to analysis that shows an extension would allow the unemployed to continue pumping money into the economy, driving economic growth and job creation.
Given those economic perks, Pelosi and other Democrats contend that blocking an extension over cost concerns misses the mark.
“Every dollar invested in this initiative yields $1.52 in economic growth, and an extension of UI could produce as many as 300,000 jobs,” she said on Friday.
My brother sent me an email and said I should read-- Why We Love Sociopaths: A Guide To Late Capitalist Television by Adam Kotsko
I have not yet got it--have you heard of it or read it
Not before your post.
I did a search and found some excerpts from the book.
I tried to skim it but I will have to bookmark and read when I have more time .
It looks interesting. I quick read suggests the premise is that we like sociopaths on TV because in real life we routinely see those who flaunt the rules as being rewarded. http://thenewinquiry.com/features/why-we-love-sociopaths/
I'll let you know what I think after I have time to read the excerpt.
From Amazon review:
ZitatSociopaths are pervasive in contemporary television, from high-brow drama all the way down to cartoons -- and of course the news as well. From the scheming Eric Cartman of South Parkto the seductive imposter Don Draper of Mad Men, cold and ruthless characters captivate us, making us wish that we could be so effective and successful. Yet why should we admire characters who get ahead by being amoral and uncaring?
In his follow-up to Awkwardness, Adam Kotsko argues that the popularity of the ruthless sociopath reflects our dissatisfaction with a failed social contract, showing that we believe that the world rewards the evil and uncaring rather than the good. By analyzing characters like the serial killer star of Dexter and the cynical Dr. House, Kotsko shows that the fantasy of the sociopath distracts us from our real problems -- but that we still might benefit from being a little more sociopathic.