A federal judge in Detroit has ruled that Democratic Rep. John Conyers, the second-most-senior member of the U.S. House, will appear on the August primary ballot, overturning a decision by Michigan's secretary of state who said the candidacy was invalid.
Judge Matthew Leitman issued an injunction ordering Conyers' name to be placed on the ballot, The Associated Press says...
There seems to have been some pretty sloppy reporting on this story. Conyers did have more than enough completely valid signatures collected. These signatures were not in dispute other than the fact that Conyers' staff was collecting them. So what? Conyers' staff wasn't registered to vote and the law states anyone who collects signatures must be a registered voter. Why? who know? Since these staffers were not registered to vote, that rendered the signatures they collected invalid. So it was a technicality that left him with only 450 signatures and disqualified them.
But really, it's not as if Conyers was going to have lost the election if this judge hadn't steeped in on his behalf. Just because his name wasn't on the ballot he still would have won the election on a write-in campaign against anyone who ran against him. These were misplaced hopes.
******************* "The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly." Abraham Lincoln
"Either the Republican party will reform itself or its going the way of the wind." Pat Caddell at CPAC