(Just remember in today's America you own NOTHING no matter if you have a paid in full statement--No property rights exist--just don't pay mandated tax or fee or whatever and see what happens)

BEAVER, Pa. (AP) — A widow was given ample notice before her $280,000 house was sold at a tax auction three years ago over $6.30 in unpaid interest, a Pennsylvania judge has ruled.

The decision last week turned down Eileen Battisti's request to reverse the September 2011 sale of her home outside Aliquippa in western Pennsylvania.

"I paid everything, and didn't know about the $6.30," Battisti said. "For the house to be sold just because of $6.30 is crazy."

Battisti, who still lives in the house, said Monday that she plans to appeal to Commonwealth Court.

Beaver County Common Pleas Judge Gus Kwidis wrote that the county tax claim bureau complied with notification requirements in state law before the auction. She had previously owed other taxes, but at the time of the sale she owed just $235, including other interest and fees.

"There is no doubt that (she) had actual receipt of the notification of the tax upset sale on July 7, 2011, and Aug. 16, 2011," the judge wrote. "Moreover, on Aug. 12, 2011, a notice of sale was sent by first class mail and was not returned."

The property sold for about $116,000, and if further appeals are unsuccessful, most of that money will be paid to Battisti. An attorney for the purchaser did not return a phone message on Monday.

Joe Askar, Beaver County's chief solicitor, said the judge got the decision right, based on the law.

"The county never wants to see anybody lose their home, but at the same time the tax sale law, the tax real estate law, doesn't give a whole lot of room for error, either," Askar said.

Battisti said her husband handled the paperwork for the property's taxes before he passed away in 2004.

"It's bad — she had some hard times, I guess her husband kind of took care of a lot of that stuff," Askar said. "It seemed that she was having a hard time coping with the loss of her husband — that just made it set in a little more."

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/ok-sell-...ill-judge-rules

Battisti, who still lives in the house,

Better get out, lady. We have a paramilitary unit recently in NV which currently has nothing to do.

I'm surprised that this decision came down against her. This will be overturned for sure. I have dealt with these matters here in PA and there is enough support in favor of the home owner over the upset buyer. That is why most people stay the hell out of buying these types of properties unless they are just looking for a quick settlement from the old owner to make the thing go away.

I am rescinding my previous proclamation about this appeal being successful. She is screwed. I just read another article on this where it went into detail on her having received notice and that she admitted knowing the money was due. The only way to beat these cases is to claim you were not notified. If she had a decent lawyer, he would have told her to play dumb, but instead she hung herself.