ZitatA specter of treason hovers over Donald Trump. He has brought it on himself by dismissing a bipartisan call for an investigation of Russia’s hacking of the Democratic National Committee as a “ridiculous” political attack on the legitimacy of his election as president.
Seventeen US national intelligence agencies have unanimously concluded that Russia engaged in cyberwarfare against the US presidential campaign. The lead agency, the CIA, has reached the further conclusion that Russia’s hacking was intended to influence the election in favor of Trump.
Admiral Michael Rogers, director of the National Security Agency and commander of the US Cyber Command, has stated, “This was not something that was done casually, this was not something that was done by chance. This was not a target that was selected purely arbitrarily. This was a conscious effort by a nation state to attempt to achieve a specific effect.” On Thursday, a senior intelligence official disclosed that there is substantial evidence that Russian President Vladimir Putin himself authorized the cyberattack.
Why does Trump publicly reject these intelligence agency conclusions and the bipartisan proposal for a congressional investigation? As president-elect, he should have a strong interest in presenting a united front against Russia’s interference with the electoral process at the core of American democracy.
There are several possible explanations for Trump’s position. They are not mutually exclusive. First, he may be trying to shore up his political standing before the Electoral College vote on Monday. Second, he may be attempting to undermine the credibility of US intelligence agencies in advance of his taking office so that he can intimidate them and have a freer hand in reshaping the intelligence product to suit his objectives. Third, he may be testing his ability to go over the heads of intelligence professionals and congressional critics and persuade the American public to follow his version of the truth about national security threats. And finally, he may be seeking to cover up evidence of involvement or prior knowledge by members of his campaign team or himself in the Russian cyberattack.
In each case the president-elect is inviting an interpretation that his behavior is treasonous.
Followed by lots more of this kind of drivel as offered by a fellow who is described as a "professor of practice in diplomacy at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy and senior fellow at the Harvard Kennedy School’s Carr Center for Human Rights Policy." PEOTUS Trump hasn't even been elected yet, much less sworn in, and the Left is already engaged in this kind of a mad mental frenzy. The next 4, maybe 8, years ought be quite interesting.
"Followed by lots more of this kind of drivel as offered by a fellow who is described as a "professor of practice in diplomacy at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy and senior fellow at the Harvard Kennedy School’s Carr Center for Human Rights Policy." PEOTUS Trump hasn't even been elected yet, much less sworn in, and the Left is already engaged in this kind of a mad mental frenzy. The next 4, maybe 8, years ought be quite interesting."
There must be an incredible amount of swag and power at stake. Progressives on both sides of the uni-party are turning themselves inside out trying to de-legitimze Trump's election, Trump, and Trump's supporters..
It will be an interesting 4, hopefully 8 years
Illegitimi non Carborundum
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.- Orwell